2026 The Race For Governor: Where the candidates stand on your priorities

Both major party candidates were invited in August to join WMPF members to hear our concerns about the state ranking among the 5 worst in the country by US News, or as the Detroit News put it “in the pits,” and to share with us their plans to drive Michigan ahead. We were grateful to be joined by gubernatorial candidate, Representative John James. Unfortunately, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson declined, citing a scheduling conflict.

Representative James laid out his approach to the state’s most pressing challenges. On education, he offered specific proposals to improve the state’s literacy, noting Mississippi’s dramatic improvements using these reforms. He further offered support for providing more options to ensure every child has access to the educational path or support that works best for them, calling access to a quality education a basic civil right.

On fiscal policy, James outlined a plan to cut the state income tax, citing billions in possible savings from eliminating pork spending and fraud, while ensuring our pension promises are funded and kept. He offered detailed plans to ignite Michigan’s business creation, job growth and career potential while focusing on retention of those growing jobs in our state.

James also addressed making energy more affordable and supply more reliable, as well as offering strong comments on making communities safer for families.

This race is consequential for the future of Michigan and we want to ensure you know where candidates stand on the issues heading into November.

Below is a full breakdown of where the candidates stand on your policy priorities.

Note: With Secretary Benson declining to join, we researched her public statements on key WMPF policy priorities. We shared our findings with her team and requested any concerns or corrections before sharing with you. Her positions below are drawn from public sources and have been reviewed by her campaign.

Michigan Legislative Scorecard

The decisions of our state legislators play a crucial role in shaping Michigan’s future. In fact, the way they vote has a direct impact on the lives of all Michiganders, our economy, and the ability of small businesses to thrive and create jobs. 

With so much at stake, it’s essential to hold our elected officials accountable for the choices they make. This legislative scorecard highlights the critical votes taken by our legislators, providing transparency and insight into how their decisions affect everyone’s well-being.

We seek a growing Michigan where we: 

  • Empower every student for a lifetime of success.
  • Ignite business creation, job growth and career potential.
  • Elevate quality of life to attract & retain families here.

This scorecard holds elected officials accountable for their votes on policies proven to impact these priorities.

You can find your district # and state representative here.

 

To give a fair and complete picture of elected officials’ history and votes on West Michigan Policy Forum priorities, this scorecard combines recorded votes from both the 2023-2024 and 2025-2026 session into a single running record. Legislators who served in only one of the two sessions are scored solely on votes cast during their time in office. 

most recent data

: Voted Favorably

A green check indicates that a legislator voted to strengthen our economy and improve Michigan’s chances of becoming a Top Ten state.

: Voted Unfavorably

A red check indicates that a legislator voted to damage our economy and hurt Michigan’s chances of becoming a Top Ten state. 

— : No Vote

A gray dash indicates that no vote was recorded.

N/A : Not serving in the Legislature at that time

Letter grade scale:  A = 90% and up    B = 80–89%    C = 70–79%    D = 60–69%    F = below 60%   

2023-2024 + 2025-2026 Michigan Legislative Session | house

MI House District Combined Score WMPF Score
SB-34

Right to Work Repeal
HB-4007

Prevailing Wages
SB-14

No Stricter than Federal Reg.
SB-12

3rd Grade Reading
SB 395/396

Weaken Teacher Evaluation

HB-5507

Diverting MPSERS Money


HB-4166

A-F in K-12


SB- 8

Minimum & Tipped Wage


HB- 4002

Earned Sick Time


HB- 4170

Indiv. Income Tax Rollback


HB- 5710

Energy Planning


HB- 5711

Clean & Renewable Energy


HB- 5520

3rd Grade Reading


HB- 5697

K5 Teacher Literacy Training


HB- 5646

Teacher Prep Programs

Dist. 1

Carter, Tyrone (D)

3/15 (20%) F
Dist. 2

Liberati, Tullio (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 3

Farhat, Alabas (D)

4/14 (29%) F —
Dist. 4

Whitsett, Karen (D)

2/9 (22%) F — — — — — —
Dist. 5

Weiss, Regina (D)

0/14 (0%) F —
Dist. 6

Price, Natalie (D)

2/8 (25%) F — — — — — — —
Dist. 7

Phillips Myers, Tonya (D)

2/8 (25%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 8

Scott, Helena (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 9

Tate, Joseph (D)

3/15 (20%) F
Dist. 9

Aiyash, Abraham (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 10

Paiz, Veronica (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 11

McKinney, Donavan (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 12

Edwards, Kimberly (D)

2/13 (15%) F — —
Dist. 13

Xiong, Mai (D)

3/9 (33%) F — — — — — —
Dist. 14

McFall, Mike (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 15

Byrnes, Erin (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 16

Young, Stephanie A. (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 17

Pohutsky, Laurie (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 18

Hoskins, Jason (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 19

Steckloff, Samantha (D)

2/14 (14%) F —
Dist. 20

Arbit, Noah (D)

3/15 (20%) F
Dist. 21

Breen, Kelly (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 22

Koleszar, Matt (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 23

Morgan, Jason (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 24

Puri, Ranjeev (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 25

Herzberg, Peter (D)

5/9 (56%) F — — — — — —
Dist. 26

Wegela, Dylan (D)

0/15 (0%) F
Dist. 27

Linting, Rylee (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 27

Churches, Jaime (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 28

Thompson, Jamie (R)

13/13 (100%) A —
Dist. 29

DeSana, James (R)

13/15 (87%) B
Dist. 30

Bruck, William (R)

11/11 (100%) A — — — —
Dist. 31

Miller, Reggie (D)

4/14 (29%) F
Dist. 32

Wilson, Jimmie (D)

1/14 (7%) F —
Dist. 33

Foreman, Morgan (D)

2/8 (25%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 33

Brabec, Felicia (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 34

Jenkins-Arno, Nancy (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 34

Zorn, Dale (R)

7/7 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 35

Wortz, Jennifer (R)

7/7 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A —
Dist. 35

Fink, Andrew (R)

7/7 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 36

Carra, Steve (R)

11/15 (73%) C
Dist. 37

Paquette, Brad (R)

14/15 (93%) A
Dist. 38

Andrews, Joey (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 39

Wendzel, Pauline (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 40

Longjohn, Matt (D)

3/8 (38%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 40

Morse, Christine (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 41

Rogers, Julie M (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 42

Hall, Matt (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 43

Smit, Rachelle (R)

14/14 (100%) A —
Dist. 44

Frisbie, Steve (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 44

Haadsma, Jim (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 45

Lightner, Sarah (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 46

Schmaltz, Kathy (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 47

Rheingans, Carrie (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 48

Conlin, Jennifer (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 49

Bollin, Ann M. (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 50

Woolford, Jason (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 50

Bezotte, Robert J. (R)

6/6 (100%) A — N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 51

Maddock, Matt (R)

14/15 (93%) A
Dist. 52

Harris, Mike (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 53

Carter, Brenda (D)

3/14 (21%) F —
Dist. 54

Steele, Donni (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 55

Tisdel, Mark (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 56

MacDonell, Sharon (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 57

Kuhn, Thomas (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 58

Robinson, Rob (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 58

Shannon, Nate (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 59

Wozniak, Douglas (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 60

Aragona, Joseph (R)

14/15 (93%) A
Dist. 61

Mentzer, Denise (D)

3/15 (20%) F
Dist. 62

St. Germaine, Alicia (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 63

DeBoyer, Jay (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 64

Pavlov, Joseph (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 64

Beeler, Andrew W. (R)

7/7 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 65

Green, Jaime (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 66

Schriver, Josh (R)

13/15 (87%) B
Dist. 67

Green, Phil (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 68

Martin, David W. (R)

2/15 (13%) A
Dist. 69

Martus, Jasper (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 70

Neeley, Cynthia (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 71

BeGole, Brian (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 72

Mueller, Mike (R)

14/14 (100%) A —
Dist. 73

Brixie, Julie (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 74

Hope, Kara (D)

2/12 (17%) F — — —
Dist. 75

Tsernoglou, Penelope (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 76

Witwer, Angela (D)

5/15 (33%) F
Dist. 77

Dievendorf, Emily (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 78

Johnsen, Gina (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 79

Rigas, Angela (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 80

Skaggs, Phil (D)

2/15 (13%) F
Dist. 81

Wooden, Stephen (D)

3/8 (38%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 81

Hood, Rachel (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 82

Grant, Kristian (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 83

Fitzgerald, John (D)

5/15 (33%) F
Dist. 84

Glanville, Carol (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 85

Slagh, Bradley (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 86

Deboer, Nancy (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 87

Snyder, Will (D)

4/15 (27%) F
Dist. 88

VanWoerkom, Greg (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 89

Meerman, Luke (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 90

Posthumus, Bryan (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 91

Outman, Pat (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 92

Neyer, Jerry (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 93

Kelly, Tim (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 93

Filler, Graham (R)

7/7 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 94

O'Neal, Amos (D)

4/14 (29%) F —
Dist. 95

Schuette, Bill (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 96

Beson, Timothy (R)

13/15 (87%) B
Dist. 97

Bierlein, Matt (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 98

Alexander, Gregory (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 99

Hoadley, Mike (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 100

Kunse, Tom (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 101

Fox, Joseph (R)

14/15 (93%) A
Dist. 102

VanderWall, Curtis (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 103

Coffia, Betsy (D)

4/13 (31%) F — —
Dist. 104

Roth, John R. (R)

13/13 (100%) A — —
Dist. 105

Borton, Ken (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 106

Cavitt, Cameron (R)

13/13 (100%) A — —
Dist. 107

Fairbairn, Parker (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 107

Friske, Neil (R)

6/7 (86%) B N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 108

Prestin, David (R)

15/15 (100%) A
Dist. 109

Bohnak, Karl (R)

8/8 (100%) A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 109

Hill, Jenn (D)

0/7 (0%) F N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 110

Markannen, Gregory (R)

15/15 (100%) A

You can find your district # and senator here.

2023-2024 + 2025-2026 Michigan Legislative Session | senate

MI Senate District Combined Score WMPF Score
SB-34

Right to Work Repeal.
HB- 4007

Prevailing Wages
SB-14

No Stricter than Federal Reg.
SB-12

3rd Grade Reading
SB- 395/396

Weaken Teacher Evaluation

HB- 5507

Diverting MPSERS Money


HB- 4166

A-F in K-12

SB- 8

Minimum and Tipped Wage

HB- 4002

Earned Sick Time


HB- 5697

K5 Teacher Literacy Training


HB- 5646

Teacher Prep Programs

Dist. 1

Geiss, Erika (D)

2/10 (20%) F —
Dist. 2

Santana, Sylvia (D)

0/9 (0%) F — —
Dist. 3

Chang, Stephanie (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 4

Camilleri, Darrin (D)

2/10 (20%) F —
Dist. 5

Polehanki, Dayna (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 6

Cavanagh, Mary (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 7

Moss, Jeremy (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 8

McMorrow, Mallory (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 9

Webber, Michael (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 10

Wojno, Paul (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 11

Klinefelt, Veronica (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 12

Hertel, Kevin (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 13

Bayer, Rosemary (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 14

Shink, Sue (D)

3/11 (27%) F
Dist. 15

Irwin, Jeff (D)

1/11 (9%) F
Dist. 16

Bellino, Joseph (R)

10/11 (91%) A
Dist. 17

Lindsey, Jonathan (R)

10/10 (100%) A — —
Dist. 18

Albert, Thomas (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 19

McCann, Sean (D)

3/10 (27%) F
Dist. 20

Nesbitt, Aric (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 21

Anthony, Sarah (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 22

Theis, Lana (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 23

Runestad, Jim (R)

10/11 (91%) A
Dist. 24

Johnson, Ruth (R)

9/10 (90%) A —
Dist. 25

Lauwers, Dan (R)

8/8 (100%) A — — — —
Dist. 26

Daley, Kevin (R)

10/10 (91%) A —
Dist. 27

Cherry, John (D)

2/11 (18%) F
Dist. 28

Singh, Sam (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 29

Brinks, Winnie (D)

4/11 (36%) F
Dist. 30

Huizenga, Mark (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 31

Victory, Roger (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 32

Bumstead, Jon (R)

10/11 (91%) A
Dist. 33

Outman, Rick (R)

10/10 (100%) A —
Dist. 34

Hauck, Roger (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 35

McDonald Rivet, Kristen (D)

0/7 (0%) F — — — —
Dist. 35

Greene, Chedrick (D)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dist. 36

Hoitenga, Michele (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 37

Damoose, John (R)

11/11 (100%) A
Dist. 38

McBroom, Ed (R)

11/11 (100%) A —

Policies and Positions

2023-2024 SESSION 

Senate Bill 34: Right to Work Repeal

Repealing our state’s landmark “Right to Work” law hurts workers and small businesses by increasing costs and reducing personal freedoms. Employees are now forced to join and financially support unions, which reduces their take-home pay. Mandatory union participation makes it harder for job providers to stay competitive and grow, which hurts our economy. 

House Bill 4007: Prevailing Wages

The new “Prevailing Wage” law harms workers and businesses by artificially inflating labor costs. It forces businesses, especially small ones, to pay above-market wages for public projects, limiting their ability to hire more workers or expand operations. It also drives up taxpayer costs for public infrastructure projects. 

Senate Bill 14: ‘Stricter than the Fed’ regulations

The measure allows the state to exceed federal standards and impose more burdensome regulations on businesses, making it harder for job providers to operate efficiently. Higher business costs result in fewer jobs, stagnant wages, and limited economic opportunities, harming Michigan’s overall economic health. 

Senate Bill 12: 3rd Grade Reading

The measure repeals a law that required third-graders to achieve reading proficiency. Third grade is a pivotal year where students transition from learning to read to reading to learn, and failing to master this skill can lead to long-term academic struggles, lower graduation rates, and reduced opportunities in adulthood.  

Senate Bills 395/396: Weaken Teacher Evaluation

The measures undermine accountability in education by reducing the emphasis on student standardized test scores when evaluating teachers. By minimizing this important metric, schools no longer have reliable data to assess teacher effectiveness. This could result in lower academic standards and ultimately harm students. 

House Bill 5507: Diverting Teacher Retirement Funding

The measure raids the public teacher retirement system of about $670 million to spend on other initiatives, even though the retirement system is still about $30 billion in debt overall. The measure also ignores a 2018 law that requires the state to stay on schedule with its debt payments. 

House Bill 4166: A-F Grades for Schools

The measure reduces accountability and transparency by repealing a law that provided simple A-F grades to school districts based on teacher and student performance. Parents and taxpayers now have a more difficult time trying to assess school performance. Without this grading system, it’s become more difficult to hold schools accountable. 

2025-2026 SESSION

Senate Bill 8: Minimum Wage and Tipped Wage Credit 

The measure protects Michigan’s tipped wage credit, which a court-ordered schedule would have phased out entirely by 2030. Keeping it helps restaurants and other small businesses stay open and keeps tipped jobs available for the workers who depend on them. It also replaces an abrupt court-ordered change with a defined, phase schedule that employers can plan around. 

House Bill 4002: Earned Sick Time

The measure amends the earned sick time law ahead of its stricter version taking effect, giving employers more workable rules. Requirements are scaled to employer size, so small businesses aren’t held to the same mandate as large ones, and employers have flexibility in how they provide the benefit and set clear notice policies. It protects small businesses from a one-size-fits-all mandate while still providing paid sick leave to workers.

House Bill 4170: Individual Income Tax Rollback

Restoring the scheduled reduction in Michigan’s personal income tax rate from 4.25% back to 4.05% puts more money directly into the pockets of Michigan workers and families. Lower income taxes make Michigan more competitive with neighboring states that have no income tax at all, helping to stem the tide of residents and businesses moving elsewhere. Every dollar returned to taxpayers is a dollar they can save, spend, or invest in their own communities.

House Bill 5710: Energy Planning: Consider All Energy Sources

This measure requires utilities to weigh all energy sources, not just those mandated by government, when planning how to meet future demand. Site selectors consistently rank energy reliability and cost among their top factors in deciding where to locate or expand a business, so a planning process grounded in sound engineering rather than political mandates helps keep Michigan competitive. Removing ideological blinders from energy planning protects both affordability and grid reliability for families and job providers alike.

House Bill 5711: Eliminate Clean & Renewable Energy Mandates

Repealing the 2023 mandates that require a fixed share of Michigan’s energy to come from government-selected sources allows the state to build on the energy assets it already has rather than forcing a costlier transition. Michigan’s residential electricity rates have already climbed faster than inflation and now exceed the national average, and rigid mandates only add to that burden. Letting sound planning, not government dictates, guide energy investment keeps costs down for families and businesses.

House Bill 5520: 3rd Grade Reading

This measure requires students to demonstrate reading proficiency before advancing to fourth grade, restoring an accountability standard Michigan repealed in 2023. Third grade is the pivotal year when students shift from learning to read to reading to learn, and states like Mississippi have shown that pairing retention with real reading support dramatically improves outcomes rather than harming them. Michigan currently ranks 44th in the nation for 4th grade reading, this measure is direct, evidence-based response to that crisis.

House Bill 5697: K-5 Teacher Literacy Training

This measure requires K-5 teachers and staff who provide or oversee reading instruction to be trained in the science of reading; the proven, evidence-based instructional methods that have helped other states climb the reading rankings. Teachers can’t teach what they haven’t been trained to teach, and this measure helps ensure Michigan’s classroom instruction finally matches what the research says works.

House Bill 5646: Science of Reading in Teacher Prep Programs

This measure requires Michigan’s teacher-preparation programs and educator certification pathways to include training in the science of reading, so new teachers enter the classroom already equipped with proven literacy instruction methods rather than learning it after the fact. Paired with HB 5697’s in-service training requirement, this closes the loop so the whole pipeline from teacher prep through the classroom is aligned around what actually works.

Contact your state Senator and Representative today and tell them to stand up for pro-business, pro-economy policies!

Help us widely share these statistics.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email